• 「经济学人」Electricity for the poor

    来源:SOHU  [  作者:LearnAndRecord   ]  责编:杨丽  |  侵权/违法举报

    原标题:「经济学人」Electricity for the poor

    More light, less clarity

    Electricity does not change poor lives as much as was thought

    Getting a power connection to the poorest of the poor may be the wrong priority for a cash-strapped government

    THOUGH SHE lives in one of the world’s poorest countries, Drocella Yandereye is a picture of upward mobility. Her small farm in Rwanda, where she grows maize, beans, bananas and coffee, is thriving. She has built a new house and turned her old one into a chicken shed. Her interests range well beyond her village, evidenced by the two posters on her living-room wall showing African leaders and the countries of the world. What makes her even more unusual is that she has electric light.

    It is not the kind of bright, leave-it-on light that people in rich countries take for granted. A small solar panel on Ms Yandereye’s roof is connected to a wall-mounted battery, which powers a radio and three LED ceiling lamps. Ms Yandereye also uses the battery to charge her mobile phone and a portable lamp that she hangs around her neck. All the lamps are rather dim. But they produce just enough light to allow her children to study after sunset, and they do not kick out foul fumes, like the kerosene lamps she used to depend on.

    Almost 140 years after Thomas Edison began selling filament light bulbs, just under 1bn people worldwide still lack access to electricity, according to the International Energy Agency, a research group. Almost two-thirds live in Africa, mostly in the countryside. The UN believes all should have power, and has set a target date to achieve universal access of 2030. That sounds plausible—since 2000 the number of people without power has fallen by 700m. Sadly, it is unlikely to happen. And recent economic research shows that rushing to illuminate the world is a bad idea.

    The old-fashioned way of bringing electricity to the masses entails building power stations and transmission lines. This is still popular. Last year India’s government claimed that it had connected every village to the power grid, although this does not mean every household is connected, still less that power is available 24 hours a day (see article). Myanmar and Senegal are racing to do the same.

    In the past few years, though, governments and aid agencies have put more faith in solar power. They have built or paid for “mini-grids” that can power a village or a school. More often they have given tax breaks and subsidies to firms that sell small solar kits. In Bangladesh, the number of solar home systems (that is, closed electricity systems powered by a small panel on the roof) shot up from 16,000 in 2003 to 4.1m by the end of 2017. Ethiopia’s “national electrification programme” calls for connecting 35% of the population to small solar systems by 2025. That proportion is expected to decline thereafter as more homes are plugged into the grid.

    Solar home systems provide much less power than grid connections, but are far cheaper to set up. The more advanced ones are often sold on a pay-as-you-go basis. Every few months, a household is asked to pay another instalment, which can be done by mobile phone. The company then sends a code, which the householder types into the battery. That keeps the lights on.

    Rwanda is trying all of these approaches at once. The government already claims to have connected 31% of households to the electricity grid, up from less than 10% in 2009. Another 11% are thought to have solar power. Helped by foreign aid, officials are now trying to connect every household to the grid or to solar power by 2025. This is just about feasible. Rwanda is small and densely populated, if annoyingly hilly, and its government is competent. Yet the projected cost is huge. Add up the mini-grids, the transmission lines, the new power stations and the credit lines to sellers of solar home systems, and Rwanda’s energy plan amounts to $3.1bn over six years. The entire government budget this year is $2.8bn.

    Not surprisingly, people enjoy having even small amounts of electricity. Ms Yandereye, who bought her lamps from One Acre Fund, a charity, says that her neighbours admire them. She has found uses for the power. She uses a portable lamp to get to her local church at night and another to light her chicken shed. Two years ago, her chickens caught a disease. Now that they have a light, she can keep the door closed, which she hopes will protect them.

    Yet most people who live in poor remote places are like Ms Yandereye’s neighbours: they desire electric light and power but cannot afford it, even with modest subsidies. For essentials, such as charging a phone, they can pay a neighbour or a shop. One study of Rwanda published last year, by Michael Grimm of the University of Passau and others, found people ready to pay between 38% and 55% of the retail price for solar-lighting kits, on average. The researchers’ kits cost between $13 and $182 depending on power levels and quality.

    Even small towns in Rwanda have shops selling solar home systems—but not necessarily to poor farmers. Local salesmen for Bboxx and Mobisol, two of the market leaders, report that many of their customers are middle-class urbanites already connected to the electricity grid. Some are buying kit for their parents in the villages. Others have become frustrated with flickering mains power and want a backup.

    A connection to the electricity grid is far more expensive. As a rule of thumb, it costs at least $1,000 in a rural area. Academics at the University of California, Berkeley, have tested Kenyan villagers’ willingness to pay. They offered a large subsidy, which brought the price of a connection down to $171. Only 24% of people plumped for it.

    If electricity and light truly transformed people’s lives, it might make sense to offer large subsidies for solar systems and grid connections or even to give them away. It might bring benefits that people could not have imagined. Or they might know about the benefits but be unable to afford the upfront cost. But there is little evidence of this. Another study by Mr Grimm and his colleagues found that Rwandans who were given solar lamps responded by lighting their households more brightly, for more hours each day. They burned less kerosene, and their children studied a little more, especially at night. But the adults’ working lives changed hardly at all. Solar lamps appear not to rescue people from poverty.

    Nor even does a grid connection. A detailed study of rural Tanzania, where America’s Millennium Challenge Corporation built power lines and subsidised connections, found little effect on adults’ welfare. Offering cheap connections cut the proportion of people living on less than $2 a day from 93% to 90%—hardly a transformation. Children’s lives changed, but perhaps not in a good way. Those who were connected went from watching almost no television to one and a half hours a day, and did even less housework than before.

    Another study, of Bangladesh, found that the benefits of grid power accrue mainly to better-off households. Hussain Samad and Fan Zhang of the World Bank estimate that connections boost the spending of people in the top fifth of the earnings scale by 11%. People in the bottom fifth see a benefit of 4%.

    A connection to the electricity grid often puts the utility company—and ultimately the government—on the hook. Many newly connected households pay little or nothing for their power, either because the power company has a progressive tariff, because people refuse to pay, or because they tap transmission lines illegally. An ongoing study of Bihar in north India by the International Growth Centre (IGC) in London finds that only 10% of people think it likely they will be penalised for failing to pay their bills or for an illegal hookup.

    One oft-cited benefit of connecting a person to the grid or to solar energy is actually diminishing. That is because many people who lack electricity no longer rely on kerosene. One Rwandan woman who is picking up her first solar lamp at a distribution point in Nzaratsi says that she has hitherto used simple torches—just batteries wired to LEDs. These are extremely cheap, costing about $0.25, and are available from village shops. People tend to throw the dead batteries in their latrines, which is hardly ideal, but is not as immediately harmful as the smoke from kerosene lamps.

    Electrification may bring benefits that economic studies miss. Robin Burgess of the IGC argues that a short-run study of households may not be the right lens: electrification might mostly benefit businesses, and not at once. Moreover, countries will have to bring power to their people eventually. But to spend a lot of scarce cash doing so now, in the hope that benefits will turn up, hardly seems enlightened.

    This article appeared in the International section of the print edition under the headline "Light to all nations?"(Feb 7th 2019)

    www.36037731.com true http://www.36037731.com/seduzx/627280/294732935.html report 9736 为您提供全方面的「经济学人」Electricity for the poor相关信息,根据用户需求提供「经济学人」Electricity for the poor最新最全信息,解决用户的「经济学人」Electricity for the poor需求,原标题:「经济学人」ElectricityforthepoorMorelight,lessclarityElectricitydoesnotchangepoorlivesasmuchaswasthoughtGettingap...
    • 猜你?#19981;?/li>
    • 24小时热文
    • 本周热评
    图文推荐
    • 最新添加
    • 最热文章
    精彩推荐
    读过此文的还读过
    教育资格教育大全EDU资格考试考试高考考试EDU教育考试教育|教育|天文|地球科学|物理|农业|生物|社会学|培训|数学|科学技术|环境学|心理学|职业教育|升学入学|化学|外语学习|医学|语文|纺织|建筑学|出国留学教育科学艺术文学地球科学化学环境科学建筑学科技留学农业培训社会学生物升学数学天文学外语物理心理学医学语文职业教育美术书法外国文学戏剧中国文学教育/科学高考菁菁校园人文学科理工学科外语学习辅助考研/考证公务员留学/出国 考试 作业作业2作业3幼儿教育幼儿读物少儿英语唐诗宋词育儿理论经验育儿知识家庭教育小升初学科竞赛其它课程小学教育初中教育中考科学学科竞赛其它课程高中教育学科竞赛其它课程职业教育中职中专职高对口职业技术培训其他成人教育成人考试电大自考专升本远程、网络教育高等教育理学工学经济学管理学文学哲学历史学法学教育学农业医学军事艺术研究生入学考试院校资料其它人文社科法律资料军事/政治广告/传媒设计/艺术教育学/心理学社会学文化/宗教哲学/历史文学研究经管营销人力资源管理财务管理生产/经营管理企业管理公共/行政管理销售/营销金融/投资经济/市场工程科技信息与通信电子/电路建筑/土木城乡/园林规划环境/食品科学电力/水利交通运输能源/化工机械/仪表冶金/矿山/地质纺织/轻工业材料科学兵器/核科学IT/计算机互联网电脑基础知识软件及应用硬件及网络自然科学数学物理化学生物学天文/地理医药卫生临床医学基础医学预防医学中医中药药学农林牧渔农学林学畜牧兽医水产渔业求职/职场简历封面/模板求职/面试职业规划自我管理与提升计划/解决方案学习计划工作计划解决方案商业计划营销/活动策划总结/汇报学习总结实习总结工作总结/汇报党团工作入党/转正申请思想汇报/心得体会党团建设工作范文制度/规范演讲/主持行政公文表格/模板合同协议书信模板表格类模板饮食游戏体育/运动音乐旅游购物娱乐时尚美容化妆影视/动漫保健养生随笔幽默滑稽语文一年级语文二年级语文三年级语文四年级语文五年级语文六年级语文数学一年级数学二年级数学三年级数学四年级数学五年级数学六年级数学英语一年级英语二年级英语三年级英语四年级英语五年级英语六年级英语一年级其它课程二年级其它课程三年级其它课程四年级其它课程五年级其它课程六年级其它课程小学作文语文初一语文初二语文初三语文数学初一数学初二数学初三数学英语初一英语初二英语初三英语政史地初一政史地初二政史地初三政史地理化生初一理化生初二理化生初三理化生初中作文语文高一语文高二语文高三语文数学高一数学高二数学高三数学英语高一英语高二英语高三英语政史地高一政史地高二政史地高三政史地理化生高一理化生高二理化生高三理化生高中作文高考外语学习英语考试英语学习日语学习法语学习韩语学习其它语言学习资格考试/认证IT认证公务员考试司法考试财会/金融考试从业资格考试?#36824;?#32771;试其它考试教学研究教学案例/设计教学计划教学?#27492;?汇报PPT模板商务科技简洁抽象艺术创意可爱清新节日庆典卡通动漫自然景观动物植物中国风国外设计风格动态背景图表模板其它模板PPT制作技巧图片/文字技巧动画/交互技巧音频/视频技巧其它技巧笔试社交礼仪其它其它其它其它调查/报告法律文书调解书判决书起诉状辩护词家居?#19994;?/a>社会民生 文库教育文档幼儿教育小学教育初中教育高中教育高等教育教学研究外语学习资格考试/认证成人教育职业教育IT/计算机经管营销医药卫生自然科学农林牧渔人文社科工程科技PPT模板PPT制作技巧求职/职场计划/解决方案总结/汇报党团工作工作范文表格/模板法律文书饮食游戏体育/运动音乐旅游购物娱乐时尚美容化妆家具?#19994;?/a>社会民生影视/动漫保健养生随笔摄影摄像幽默滑稽 小学作文初中作文高中作文话题作文考试作文单元作文作文素材儿童教育 教学设计文库22 34 56 78 910 1112 1314 15文库2文库作文总结建筑资料库考研14综合范文 教学方法综合教案英语学习学习中心教育资讯1教育资讯1 考试 课题研究课件下载考试试卷留学类日记语文教学资源托福知道 教育论文教育生活学习方法模拟考教育教育资讯1英语作文 日常工作资源公务员考试简笔画考试作文问答 资讯综合学习学习考试学习方法学习问答外语学习资格考试职场学习交流高考清华大学复旦大学毕业季厦门大学浙江大学武汉大学作文南京大学五道口职业技术学校翻译韩语英语英文名日语英语翻译教师资格证智联招聘前程无忧语文日记数学读后感读书笔记
    777788大丰收一波中特